Sounds like a book reappraisers will love and reasserters will love to hate. Since when does a novel have to pass an orthodoxy exam to be a good, spiritually uplifting read?
The Puritans have returned to Anglicanism to have another go at the Church. There will be blood. On some days Jesus still weeps. Why don’t reasserters join forces under one tent that already has a history, infrastructure, seminaries, and is traditional, conservative and orthodox: The Reformed Episcopal Church?

I liked the book.  It’s a novel and should be read as a metaphor not as if it were Scripture.  I plan to give copies away to family members who struggle with God over the concepts of justice and mercy.

RE: “The Puritans have returned to Anglicanism to have another go at the Church.”

Heh—I love this kind of rhetoric from someone who clearly has no clue what a puritan in modern-day America would look like or believe.  The most conservative reasserters in TEC are liberal by puritan standards.

Further—I’ve already had highly conservative members of TEC weigh in in favor of the book.  They’re all for artistic license in the arena of fiction—just not in the arena of creeds, doctrines, theology, etc. 

Pity that our PB doesn’t recognize the difference.

RE: “Why don’t reasserters join forces under one tent that already has a history, infrastructure, seminaries, and is traditional, conservative and orthodox: The Reformed Episcopal Church?”

Same reason why progressives didn’t join forces “under one tent that already has a history, infrastructure, seminaries,” etc of their own wildly revisionist theology?  ; > )