| May 2013 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
click on a date to see all the day's entries
About TitusOneNine
Old Titusonenine site (Jan04-May07)Kendall's Bio
Kendall's e-mail (replace -at- with @)
"Elves" e-mail (blog admin)
A free floating commentary on culture, politics, economics, and religion based on a passionate commitment to the truth and a desire graciously to refute that which is contrary to it….
"He must hold firm to the sure word as taught, so that he may be able to give instruction in sound doctrine and also to confute those who contradict it."
--Titus 1:9, Revised Standard Version
Blog Tips & Info
Info to help you learn your way around the new blog, and posts where you can report problems or offer suggestions
Mobile-friendly view (blog headlines): Click HerePrint-friendly view of all articles: Click Here
Recent Comments Page:
Click Here
Registration & Login Help
Blog Tips Series
Categories
The above list is limited to "parent" categories. To see the entire category index and select specific sub-categories, click on "Full Category Index"
Full Category Index
Monthly Archives
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007

Anglican / Episcopal RSS Feed
©2013 Kendall S. Harmon. All rights reserved.
TitusOneNine Links Page
I. Anglican / Episcopal Resources & Links
1. Important Documents
documents are in chronological order, most recent first
Also, don't miss:
2. Websites & Blogs
A. Official websites
B. Anglican / Episcopal News
C. Anglican / Episcopal Blogs
By no means exhaustive. Let us know what we've missed
Previous versions of Titusonenine:
NORTH AMERICAN ANGLICANS:
Reasserters' Blogs:
Reappraisers' Blogs
INTERNATIONAL ANGLICAN BLOGS & BLOGGERS
BLOGGING BISHOPS (US & Overseas)
II. General Resources & Links
YET more links coming soon...! including Non-Anglican links
Visit msnbc.com for Breaking News, World News, and News about the Economy
I caught this in the morning this week by accident--it is important. Watch it all.
Filed under: * Culture-Watch Blogging & the Internet Science & Technology Teens / Youth Young Adults

|
2. New Reformation Advocate wrote:
You’re right, Kendall. This is an eye-opener. It’s really scary. Every state ought to ban texting while driving, ASAP. David Handy+ June 27, 6:14 am | [comment link] |
|
3. Katherine wrote:
I once saw a woman in the left lane on I-285 in suburban Atlanta applying mascara. Texting is just as stupid. If you must text, pull into a parking lot. June 27, 6:28 am | [comment link] |
|
4. Dee in Iowa wrote:
When they finally get around to “the law”, let’s ban everything while driving except driving….smoking, using the telephone in any form, watching VCR (yes, some do), and taking your eye off the road to look at the person to whom you are talking…...how many times have you been riding with someone and they have to look at you to talk to you…not good…... June 27, 8:04 am | [comment link] |
|
5. Michael+ wrote:
At the conclusion of my latest physical exam, my doctor pointed to my iPhone and said, “There’s your greatest health risk. Don’t text, email, or talk while you drive.” End of exam. June 27, 9:20 am | [comment link] |
|
6. Carol R wrote:
THe only way I would be watching MSNBC would have to be by “accident.” June 27, 11:09 am | [comment link] |
|
7. Jon wrote:
David H and others… I would be curious to hear how these anti-texting laws play out in practice (in the states that have passed them). How exactly do they get enforced? That’s an honest question by the way… I am not trying to mock the idea or imply there is no way the laws could work. But when I compare them to DUI laws, they sound different. When a policeman pulls someone over for suspicion of drunk driving, there are objective ways to prove that the person is in fact wasted. But when the cop pulls the person suspected of texting over, it becomes an essential HISTORICAL question. Not “are you drunk right now as I the cop talk to you” but WERE you texting 3 minutes ago. I get nervous when we empower police to pull people over and purely on the basis of what the cop thinks he saw in a brief flash of time as you passed him (he thinks he saw you texting) you get convicted of a crime—no objective measures of any kind needed. No radar guns, no breathalyzer, no walking in a straight line, and so on. I am also nervous about empowering the state to seize phone records purely on the basis of what a cop thinks he might have seen. On the other hand, I certainly agree that texting is outrageously dangerous. It’s just that I don’t necessarily believe that “there outta be a law” is the solution to all questions of bad behavior in life. Your thoughts? June 27, 11:24 am | [comment link] |
|
8. Dee in Iowa wrote:
I do believe that texting leaves a time line record. The problem would be that it could be produced in court, and if the record shows one was texting - guilty….but - if the record did not indicate texting at the time in question, seems to me the party could sue for false arrest…..anyone know if I am right about time line record? June 28, 12:38 pm | [comment link] |
|
9. Jon wrote:
You are definitely right, Dee… texting certainly leaves a time stamp. But here are the things that make me nervous. First off we’d have to agree as a society that any time a police office thinks that you might have used your cell phone while driving, the state has the right to seize all phone records registered in your name and/or seize all mobile devices in your car and/or person at the time of the alleged incident. That alone makes me really nervous. Part of our identity as Americans is having a very high regard for privacy and private property and freedom. Historically we set the bar VERY high for what the state has to prove before it can seize or search private property. Naturally there’s a lot you can accomplish in a police state—incidents of rape, murder, theft and so on were indeed much lower in say the USSR during the 60s and 70s than they were in the US. But traditionally Americans say that we are willing to endure a higher incident of social irresponsibility if it means having strong protections for privacy and individual freedom. Secondly even such seizures of phone records would be ambiguous. Suppose you really were texting at the time—but you were doing it on a phone not registered in your name. The phone records would “prove” you were innocent. Or suppose the cop was wrong, but by accident your wife used your joint phone to send a text at that time. Again, I am curious how these laws have been framed in the states where they have been enacted. Thanks for your thoughts, Dee! June 28, 3:05 pm | [comment link] |
Next entry (above): AP: South Carolina’s First Lady told him to end it
Previous entry (below): Church Times: North American Anglicans hold inaugural gathering
Return to blog homepage
Return to Mobile view (headlines)

I observed a teenager texting while driving last week. She was so oblivious to other vehicles that she almost caused a serious accident when she cut another driver off near an intersection.
June 27, 1:12 am | [comment link]