Some secularists seem to like one-way streets. Their distaste for Christianity leads them to seek to drive it not only from the public square but even from any provision of education, health care, and welfare services. Ironically, intolerance of Christianity and Christian culture is proclaimed most often in the name of tolerance: Christianity must not be tolerated because of the need for greater tolerance.

At present, the most preferred means for addressing perceived intolerance seems to be antidiscrimination legislation. Across the Anglosphere and in many Western nations, the idea of antidiscrimination has shown enormous power to shape public opinion. It is being used to redefine marriage and to make a range of relationships acceptable as the foundation for new forms of the family. Antidiscrimination legislation, in tandem with new reproductive technologies, has made it possible for children to have three, four, or five parents, relegating the idea of a child being brought up by his natural mother and father to nothing more than a majority adult preference. The rights of children to be created in love and to be known and reared by their biological parents receives scant consideration when the legislative agenda is directed to satisfying adult needs and ambitions.

Until relatively recently, antidiscrimination laws usually included exemptions for churches and other religious groups so that they could practice and manifest their beliefs in freedom. That word exemptions is actually a misnomer, suggesting as it does some sort of concession from the state to eccentric minorities. These provisions are better described as protections of religious freedom—and such protections are increasingly being refused or defined in the narrowest possible terms in new antidiscrimination measures, with existing protections eroded or construed away by the courts.

Read it all.

Filed under: * Culture-Watch • Religion & Culture • * International News & Commentary • Australia / NZ • * Religion News & Commentary • Other Churches • Roman Catholic • Other Faiths • Secularism

1. Sick & Tired of Nuance wrote: This is a path to revolution.  Christians can tolerate much, but when the choice is between obeying God or the State, the Lord wins. August 7, 8:23 pm | [comment link]

2. azusa wrote: Sydney is well served by its two archbishops. Pell wrote a fine piece in First Things a while back on Islam. August 8, 3:41 am | [comment link]

Registered members must log in to comment.