There is no ‘law’ only the fear of a lawsuit. Go ahead and sing it. As to the fictional ‘wall of separation between Church and State’, Mr. Justice of the Supreme Court, “tear down this wall!”

I’m certainly no legal eagle, but it seems to me that, if the choir chose to present the song without the participation of the choir director, they could make the case that the singing of the Lord’s Prayer was student-led and student-initiated, and therefore protected under the First Amendment.  I am, of course, willing to be corrected.

The sad part is that a major portion of standard vocal repertoire is Christian. Kids are being deprived of a significant educational experience. Think: Mozart’s Ave Verum, much of Tallis, Byrd, and Palestrina, Bach, and even Beethoven.

Sad, Sad, Sad.

To sing a prayer is wrong, but to hold a secular graduation in a Church is okay?

The chilling effect of ‘legal advice’. Sing it!
Remember what US money declares.

Logically, following the school’s position, they ought not to be comemorating Szymanski at all. In a ruthlessly secular logic, he’s not a current student and therefore not of present interest whatsoever.

I also found the contradiction between the absolute “The Supreme Court has ruled that prayer at a graduation ceremony isn’t appropriate” and the waffling “Court rulings on similar cases are inconsistent” rather humorous. The administration can’t quite seem to get the story straight.

The Lord’s prayer was sung by an opera singer at tonight’s Memorial Day concert featuring the National Symphony at the Capitol in Washington, DC.

I remember a few years ago, a valedictorian was told he could not invoke the name of God in his speech.  So with a few of his classmates, he concocted a plan and word spread quickly.
When he took the stage and stood at the podium, he pulled out a handkerchief and loudly sneezed into the microphone.  With one voice, the entire graduating class roared out:

GOD BLESS YOU!