(First Things) Douglas Farrow—Blurring Sexual Boundaries

Posted by Kendall Harmon

The proposed addition of “gender identity and expression” carries that transformation even further by suppressing the binary logic itself. Backers of these bills often make no attempt to disguise this. “One of the great myths of our culture,” insists the Canadian Labor Congress, “is that at birth each infant can be identified as distinctly ‘male’ or ‘female’ (biological sex), will grow up to have correspondingly ‘masculine’ or ‘feminine’ behavior (public gender), live as a ‘man’ or a ‘woman’ (social gender role), and marry a woman or a man (heterosexual affective orientation). This is not so.”

The standard notion of sex, then, must be replaced by the more malleable concepts of sexual orientation and gender identity. And I do mean must. Here in Quebec a recent government white paper promises to wipe society clean of both homophobia and heterosexism—that is, of any “affirmation of heterosexuality as a social norm or the highest form of sexual orientation [and of any] social practice that conceals the diversity of sexual orientations and identities.”

What this will mean in the long run for the legal protection of women remains to be seen, of course, but we can’t have it both ways. Sex cannot serve as an effective legal marker for discrimination if its binary nature dissolves into fluid sexual subjectivities. In that sense, these bills constitute unfriendly amendments to the civil and criminal codes they purport to refine or perfect.

Read it all.

Filed under: * Culture-WatchLaw & Legal IssuesPsychologyReligion & CultureSexuality* International News & CommentaryCanada* TheologyAnthropology

3 Comments
Posted February 24, 2011 at 6:22 am [Printer Friendly] [Print w/ comments]



1. DTerwilliger wrote:

Just read the article last night before bed.  I think it demonstrates well the tyranny of human convention accommodating subjectivity over publicly accessible facts.

February 24, 12:37 pm | [comment link]
2. Larry Morse wrote:

This is one more case of the far left and marginal taking a simple distinctions and using fringe variations to undertake fundamental redefinitions. This is as tiresome as it is irrational. Larry

February 26, 12:22 am | [comment link]
3. Sick & Tired of Nuance wrote:

Orwell wrote fiction…right?

February 26, 2:29 am | [comment link]
Registered members must log in to comment.




Next entry (above): (NPR) Spiking Oil Prices: Time To Worry Yet?

Previous entry (below): (RNS) Budget Cuts Target the Poor, Faith Groups Say

Return to blog homepage

Return to Mobile view (headlines)