What’s in a name? A lot, for Southern Baptist Convention

Posted by Kendall Harmon

What's in a name? As Shakespeare has it, a rose by any other name smells the same. But in the case of America's largest Protestant denomination, changing the name could change everything.

A week ago, Southern Baptist Convention President Bryant Wright told his organization's executive committee in Nashville that he had appointed a task force to study a possible name change. Abandoning the 166-year-old identifier, he argued, would help the group thrive both in America and internationally.

Read it all.

Filed under: * Christian Life / Church LifeParish Ministry* Culture-WatchReligion & Culture* International News & CommentaryAmerica/U.S.A.* Religion News & CommentaryOther ChurchesBaptists

2 Comments
Posted September 26, 2011 at 11:29 am [Printer Friendly] [Print w/ comments]



1. RMBruton wrote:

Could this cause a schism? Some might continue to identify themselves as Southern Baptists, while others might become the BC/NA (Baptist Church in North America), still others might form any number of Continuing Southern Baptist Conventions. This could be interesting.

September 26, 3:48 pm | [comment link]
2. Ian+ wrote:

Since they’ve got so much going on outside the US, not just the South, the name doesn’t mean what it once did.

September 26, 8:22 pm | [comment link]
Registered members must log in to comment.




Next entry (above): Sunday worship service will be last in new church for St. Mark’s Episcopal in Michigan

Previous entry (below): Charles Baldwin—“Beautifully Made, Dealer’s Pick, Unlimited Warranty”

Return to blog homepage

Return to Mobile view (headlines)