(Living Church) Bishop Henderson Explains His Understanding of the Disciplinary Board’s Duty

Posted by Kendall Harmon

A question has arisen about the process for administration of the so-called “abandonment” canon (Title IV.16) especially as it applies to bishops. Although it has come in a couple of forms, the question might be expressed in this way: “Who initiates action when information arises which indicates that abandonment of The Episcopal Church may have occurred?”

In accordance with the canon, such proceedings are begun at the initiative of the Disciplinary Board itself (although this has not happened within memory, if ever), or when information is received by the Disciplinary Board from any credible source with standing to raise the issue. Perhaps the following is helpful.

Title IV.16 is entitled “Of Abandonment of The Episcopal Church,” and sub-section (A) is the portion thereof which relates to bishops. It designates that conduct which constitutes abandonment and specifies the process for administration of the canon when such conduct happens, or is alleged to have happened.

Read it all.

Filed under: * Anglican - EpiscopalEpiscopal Church (TEC)TEC BishopsTEC ConflictsTEC Conflicts: South CarolinaTEC Polity & Canons* South Carolina

0 Comments
Posted October 11, 2011 at 8:02 pm [Printer Friendly] [Print w/ comments]
Registered members must log in to comment.




Next entry (above): From the Morning Bible Readings

Previous entry (below): (CNS) Washington cardinal confirms members of former Episcopal community

Return to blog homepage

Return to Mobile view (headlines)