Nelson Jones—It is time to end the historic right of Anglican bishops to sit in the House of Lords

Posted by Kendall Harmon

One thing above all stood out from Rowan Williams's evidence yesterday evening to the Parliamentary committee looking at proposals to reform the House of Lords, and that is that the Church of England is very keen to maintain its peculiar historic privilege of having bishops in the legislature. Indeed, he and the church he leads see it as a vital part of their wider role in British society.

The present situation might be seen as anomalous, he conceded (albeit "a constructive anomaly"). There were no ecclesiastical representatives deputed from Scotland (where the Presbyterian church also has official status) or from Wales or Northern Ireland, where there are no established churches. In a multi-faith society the absence of automatic representation for other religions might also be seen as problematic. Williams wouldn't object were some mechanism found for incorporating Jewish, Muslim or Hindu leaders, though he foresaw problems in identifying such leaders. But he didn't seem to think of this as much as a priority, in any case, since the religious voice was so well represented already by himself and by his fellow Anglican prelates.

It's at times like these that you realise the centrality of its legal establishment to the Church of England's sense of itself.

Read it all.

Filed under: * Anglican - EpiscopalArchbishop of Canterbury Anglican ProvincesChurch of England (CoE)CoE Bishops* Culture-WatchHistoryLaw & Legal IssuesReligion & Culture* Economics, PoliticsPolitics in General* International News & CommentaryEngland / UK

2 Comments
Posted November 29, 2011 at 7:45 am [Printer Friendly] [Print w/ comments]



1. Vatican Watcher wrote:

But he didn’t seem to think of this as much as a priority, in any case, since the religious voice was so well represented already by himself and by his fellow Anglican prelates.

From the man’s own mouth.  Need we further proof?

November 29, 11:45 am | [comment link]
2. driver8 wrote:

Speaking of historical anomalies - it’s a bit surprising that the New Statesman still has enough subscribers to exist.

November 29, 2:29 pm | [comment link]
Registered members must log in to comment.




Next entry (above): Crisis in Europe Tightens Credit Across the Globe

Previous entry (below): (Time Magazine) Bill Saporito Play the Lottery? You Bet

Return to blog homepage

Return to Mobile view (headlines)