I guess that recalling the York Massacre isn’t sufficient reason to recognize that numbers don’t reflect the historical claims of Jewry on the English conscience.
http://ddickerson.igc.org/cliffords-tower.html

Tom

I was actually at that tower when I visited York and always wondered what it was.

But I must be reading you wrong-are you actually making the David Duke revisionist/relavitist “there are never as many as ‘they’ claim there are” argument?

Sorry Brian, perhaps I needed less sarcasm and more specificity.

If you didn’t kill them off at critical times and make them unwelcome for most of your history, there might be more Jews in the UK to make the numerical pro rations better in making up this committee. There is such a thing as a historical debt, especially when it can repaid as cheaply as giving up one committee seat.

For purposes of my own nation’s historical debts, I would consider formal respect of Native American religious precepts and general needs as being an equally compelling claim. Even if there are only nominal Indian followers of long dead cults.

Edited by elf.

Tom

I was worried for a mi9nute!  I’m with you 100%

At first I was shocked at the headline.  Then, upon further investigation, I discovered that the Islamics and others are excluded also, with the point being that this is to be a lobbying body for Christian denominations.

Were the Muslims and Buddhists and Hindus included I’d be very horrified.  But since they are not, than the exclusion of the Jewish leaders is also understandable.  Furthermore, the fact that the body is to be a Christian body also makes understandable that the Unitarians are excluded, since they proudly proclaim all religions as equal anyway.

Here’s the key quote at the bottom of the story:

“If actual membership was expanded to include everyone, administrative costs would rocket, he said. The aim is to give a kind of associate membership to Unitarians, Jews, Muslims and other non-Trinitarian religious bodies. When a legislative topic comes up that affects one of these groups in particular, they will be brought into consultations. “The purpose is to make it more useful to more people more often,” said Mr Bottomley.”