I listened to this story yesterday on my way to serve at St. Andrew’s, Bessemer City, NC, off I-85 near the NC/SC line, and I can’t think what further steps the church could take.  I was reminded of Nicodemus’ question in John 3 when Jesus told him he must be born again.  The story appears to be of a bitter old and isolated man for whom we need to pray.

I have no idea what “de-baptism” means, but apparently it means that the Church is to destroy all records that this guy was baptized in the first place.  Even in France, with its truly wacky laws, it’s hard to believe that the state can order an organization to engage in retro-active purges of the historical record.  “See—here’s a picture of Zinoviev standing next to Stalin—but now, look!  There’s nothing but blue sky next to Stalin because Zinoviev was NEVER EVEN BORN! Or baptized!

Actually, Zinoviev never was baptized, because he was Jewish, but we wouldn’t know this or anything else about history if the people who keep the records were continually forced to alter them to suit the political correctness of the times.

I noted this in the article:  the pope preaching against condoms in AIDS-racked Africa.  This takes us a little off-piste, I know, but can any of you point to where, when and what was said, in this respect?  Because I cannot recall anything like that.

This man is just playing games.  The Roman Church doesn’t de-baptize because it can’t.  Anyone who wishes to stick their finger in Rome’s eye and formally proclaim their separation from the RCC needs to fill out a formal Declaration of Defection from
the Roman Catholic Church (Actus formalis defectionis ab Ecclesia catholica). 

Send copies to the diocese and the local parish priest as well as the parish where you were baptized.  There are sample copies of such a declaration that can be found on the internet by a simple Google search.  Personally I see no point, again unless your just interesting in putting fingers in eyes.  I certainly never felt the need to do this when I moved on.

This man has never left the Catholic Church. He carries it around with him constantly,  but as a terrible burden, not a healing joy. 

Should he win his cause, what will he do next to resolve his soul’s torment?

Fr. Tee -

He gave a similar message to African bishops who visited the Vatican in 2005, when he told them that abstinence and fidelity, not condoms, were the means to tackle the epidemic.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7947460.stm

I quoted that section from the middle of the article, but there is also this

HIV/Aids was, he argued, “a tragedy that cannot be overcome by money alone, that cannot be overcome through the distribution of condoms, which can even increase the problem”.

The solution lay, he said, in a “spiritual and human awakening” and “friendship for those who suffer”.

To a certain kind of mind, this turns into ‘‘preaching against condoms’‘.