| May 2013 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | |
click on a date to see all the day's entries
About TitusOneNine
Old Titusonenine site (Jan04-May07)Kendall's Bio
Kendall's e-mail (replace -at- with @)
"Elves" e-mail (blog admin)
A free floating commentary on culture, politics, economics, and religion based on a passionate commitment to the truth and a desire graciously to refute that which is contrary to it….
"He must hold firm to the sure word as taught, so that he may be able to give instruction in sound doctrine and also to confute those who contradict it."
--Titus 1:9, Revised Standard Version
Blog Tips & Info
Info to help you learn your way around the new blog, and posts where you can report problems or offer suggestions
Mobile-friendly view (blog headlines): Click HerePrint-friendly view of all articles: Click Here
Recent Comments Page:
Click Here
Registration & Login Help
Blog Tips Series
Categories
The above list is limited to "parent" categories. To see the entire category index and select specific sub-categories, click on "Full Category Index"
Full Category Index
Monthly Archives
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007

Anglican / Episcopal RSS Feed
©2013 Kendall S. Harmon. All rights reserved.
TitusOneNine Links Page
I. Anglican / Episcopal Resources & Links
1. Important Documents
documents are in chronological order, most recent first
Also, don't miss:
2. Websites & Blogs
A. Official websites
B. Anglican / Episcopal News
C. Anglican / Episcopal Blogs
By no means exhaustive. Let us know what we've missed
Previous versions of Titusonenine:
NORTH AMERICAN ANGLICANS:
Reasserters' Blogs:
Reappraisers' Blogs
INTERNATIONAL ANGLICAN BLOGS & BLOGGERS
BLOGGING BISHOPS (US & Overseas)
II. General Resources & Links
YET more links coming soon...! including Non-Anglican links
Conceived in the heady post-Cold War 1990s, the futuristic fifth-generation [F-35] jet fighter was to be a technological marvel built in a rush and paid for with "peace dividend" dollars.
But now with the economic crash, the fighter is billions over budget and years behind schedule.
Here's part of the problem: axing the F-35 would eliminate tens of thousands of jobs in 47 states. Few members of Congress are willing to go along.
Read it all.
Filed under: * Culture-Watch Science & Technology * Economics, Politics Defense, National Security, Military Economy Labor/Labor Unions/Labor Market The U.S. Government Budget The National Deficit Politics in General House of Representatives Office of the President Senate

|
2. C. Wingate wrote:
The F-35 is a worse repeat of the F-111 “an aardvark is an eagle designed by a committee” program. Eventually some service is going to say, “Look, we need an airplane we can actually keep in the air, and this isn’t it”; the rest of the procurement is going to be terminated and the existing planes are going to be retired early, together with the F-22 if they can swing it. As far as I know they haven’t ironed out the oxygen supply problems with the latter. Flight hours on the F-35, meanwhile, are quite poor, and the per unit cost naturally keeps rising. I’ve said it elsewhere, but it bears repeating: I suspect they could start from scratch and develop 3-4 different planes for the various missions, and still come out ahead. January 30, 9:57 pm | [comment link] |
|
3. Cennydd13 wrote:
With fighters like the F-15 and F-16, there is only just so much “design stretchability” built in, and the next step up is a completely new design. Unfortunately, development costs have far outpaced affordability, and we are actually getting fewer aircraft for a mission or missions for which we have no realistic idea of how many we’lll need. Therefore, smaller and cheaper aircraft designed for specific missions should be the answer. And do we need three versions of the F-35, when two could do the same job? Do we need a separate Air Force F-35 when the Navy’s version could fill the bill? No. Does the Marine Corps need the jump-jet version of the F-35? Why? Why not hand it over to the Navy and cancel the Navy version? January 30, 11:46 pm | [comment link] |
Next entry (above): (Economist Newsbook Blog) Sarkozy’s German fixation
Previous entry (below): Virginia Episcopal Bishop Shannon Johnston’s Diocesan Council Address
Return to blog homepage
Return to Mobile view (headlines)

Yes, the F-35 is way over budget and years behind schedule, but remember this: Our potential (yes, I said that) enemy, China is not exactly standing still with their development of tactical strike aircraft designed for an offensive war in the Pacific, and we have to be ready to meet that threat. We cannot meet that threat with aircraft such as the F-15 and F-16, which are getting long in the tooth. Technology does not stand still, and we don’t want to be caught napping. Could a cheaper single-role tactical fighter be developed? Sure, but could it do the job? Probably. And how good is good enough? How good does it have to be? Obviously, it has to be good enough to do the job it was designed for.
January 30, 9:01 pm | [comment link]