Supreme Court says states may not impose mandatory life sentences on juvenile murderers

Posted by Kendall Harmon

(Assiduous blog readers may remember we took a special interest in this case earlier this year).

A divided Supreme Court on Monday said states may not impose on juvenile murderers mandatory life sentences without the possibility of parole.

The 5 to 4 ruling said such mandatory sentences offend the constitution’s prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment, and follow a trend at the court of treating even the worst juvenile offenders differently from adults....

“The court took a significant step forward by recognizing the fundamental unfairness of mandatory death-in-prison sentences that don’t allow sentencers to consider the unique status of children and their potential for change,” said EJI [Equal Justice Initiative]’s Bryan Stevenson. “The court has recognized that children need additional attention and protection in the criminal justice system.”

Read it all.

Filed under: * Culture-WatchLaw & Legal IssuesTeens / Youth* Economics, PoliticsPolitics in GeneralState Government

Posted June 26, 2012 at 7:00 am [Printer Friendly] [Print w/ comments]
Registered members must log in to comment.

Next entry (above): (BBC) EU unveils its vision for the future of monetary union

Previous entry (below): (CNN) Immigration reform back to square one

Return to blog homepage

Return to Mobile view (headlines)