[Washington Times] NAPOLITANO: Roberts unleashes vast federal power

Posted by The_Elves

The logic in the majority opinion is the jurisprudential equivalent of passing a camel through the eye of a needle. The logic is so tortured, unexpected and unprecedented that even the law’s most fervent supporters did not make or anticipate the court’s argument in its support. Under the Constitution, a tax must originate in the House, which this law did not, and it must be applied for doing something, like earning income or purchasing tobacco or fuel, not for doing nothing. In all the history of the court, it has never held that a penalty imposed for violating a federal law was really a tax.

Read it all

Filed under:

Posted June 30, 2012 at 8:18 am [Printer Friendly] [Print w/ comments]
Registered members must log in to comment.

Next entry (above): [Washington Post] Randy Barnett : We lost on healthcare but the Constitution won

Previous entry (below): [Reuters] Egypt’s first Islamist president takes oath

Return to blog homepage

Return to Mobile view (headlines)