Of Disparate Faiths, but of Like Mind on Dress Code

Posted by Kendall Harmon

From yesterday's New York Times, page B5:

On a Saturday morning in September 1987, Eric Stern stood before the congregation of a Queens synagogue, chanting the Torah part for his bar mitzvah. His passage spanned several chapters of Deuteronomy and was notable for containing 74 of the 613 commandments that govern observant Jewish life.

One verse stipulated that a woman should never wear male clothing, or vice versa, or else be “abhorrent” in the eyes of God. The rule forms one strand in the fabric of biblical statements and Talmudic commentaries that espouse and indeed hallow a concept of modesty, known by the Hebrew word “tznius.”

About the same time that Mr. Stern was intoning the religious dress code, a teenage girl, Tahita Jenkins, was learning the same concept from the same passage a few neighborhoods away in Far Rockaway. Ms. Jenkins, though, happened to be an African-American Christian, and her Pentecostal church imbued her with the belief that, among other things, a woman should never wear pants.

While Ms. Jenkins gave over to that particular temptation a few times in high school, she stuck with long skirts all through her studies in technical college and jobs with a bank, hospital, grocery store and three bus companies. Only when she was hired as a New York City bus driver two months ago did her attire become an object of controversy, leading to her dismissal.

The dismissal, in turn, brought her to Mr. Stern, who is now her lawyer, and to a seemingly unlikely partnership that is, on closer inspection, altogether logical. The common bond of Orthodox Jew and Pentecostal Christian is a belief in the right of a devout person to dress according to religious belief, without the risk of being fired.

Read it all.

Filed under: * Culture-WatchLaw & Legal IssuesReligion & Culture* Religion News & CommentaryOther ChurchesPentecostalOther FaithsIslam

6 Comments
Posted July 15, 2007 at 5:42 pm [Printer Friendly] [Print w/ comments]



1. libraryjim wrote:

Ah, but pants made for women are not “men’s clothing”.  In the same way, a Man’s Kilt is not “women’s clothing”.  So there are loopholes. 

Besides, I don’t recall pants being worn by male or female in the Bible.  wink

July 15, 6:03 pm | [comment link]
2. Br. Michael wrote:

A kilt is Ok, but I don’t know about pants…...  Only true men wear kilts!

July 15, 6:41 pm | [comment link]
3. Katherine wrote:

8-10 years ago there was a girl playing basketball for the U. of Georgia who was from a conservative Protestant sect that required skirts, even on the court.  They made her a divided skirt, just below knee length, of the same material as the other uniforms, and let her play.  Why can’t the bus company compromise?

July 15, 11:01 pm | [comment link]
4. Irenaeus wrote:

Trousers did not become standard men’s clothing in Western Europe before the 16th century—-some two thousand years after the Exodus.

July 15, 11:58 pm | [comment link]
5. ElaineF. wrote:

Of all the things that must be abhorrent to the Lord in today’s world, I’m not sure that pants vs skirts would be high up on the A-List.

July 16, 12:38 am | [comment link]
6. libraryjim wrote:

April 6 is “Tartan Day” in the U.S. I wonder what would happen if all the men living near a Pentecostal Holiness church showed up in kilts at their worship the Sunday nearest?  Would they be shown the door?  Interesting to ponder.  smile

July 16, 9:55 am | [comment link]
Registered members must log in to comment.




Next entry (above): Pastor’s Plight Shows Burden of Student Debt

Previous entry (below): Episcope does some Follow up on former Porn actor New York Times Article posted Yesterday

Return to blog homepage

Return to Mobile view (headlines)