David Brooks on the Polls—They are very limited in what they can tell us

Posted by Kendall Harmon

If there’s one thing we know, it’s that even experts with fancy computer models are terrible at predicting human behavior. Financial firms with zillions of dollars have spent decades trying to create models that will help them pick stocks, and they have gloriously failed.

Scholars at Duke University studied 11,600 forecasts by corporate chief financial officers about how the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index would perform over the next year. The correlation between their estimates and the actual index was less than zero.

And, if it’s hard to predict stocks or the economy, politics is a field perfectly designed to foil precise projections.

Read it all.

Filed under: * Culture-WatchPsychology* Economics, PoliticsPolitics in GeneralUS Presidential Election 2012

0 Comments
Posted November 1, 2012 at 5:15 am [Printer Friendly] [Print w/ comments]
Registered members must log in to comment.




Next entry (above): Alister McGrath Urges Lutherans to Share Doctrine with Contemporary Culture

Previous entry (below): Robert Samuelson—Election 2012 may be Pollsters’ moment of truth Also

Return to blog homepage

Return to Mobile view (headlines)