Malicious prosecution warnings for Episcopal clergy from a prominent Lawyer and Lay Leader

Posted by Kendall Harmon

As a deputy to the 2006 convention, Mr. [Michael] Rehill helped lead the legislative fight against adoption of the changes. However, he did not attend the 2009 convention in Anaheim where the deputies accepted the reforms based upon assurances it was “pastoral" and "healing" rather than "legal", and “that it would reduce the number Title IV cases”.

As a result “they voted away virtually all of the canonical rights of Clergy in Title IV matters,” and “unfortunately, the representations of the proponents proved to be wrong, and the results have been devastating for many clergy.”

As an alternate deputy to the 2012 convention in Indianapolis, Mr. Rehill testified in committee hearings seeking to “restore many of those fundamental Clergy rights, and to restore justice as the primary focus of the process,” he said, but noted these “efforts were not successful, in part because of the bureaucratic structure of General Convention and in part because the authors/proponents of the current Title IV were in control of the legislative process.”

Read it all.

Filed under: * Anglican - EpiscopalEpiscopal Church (TEC)General Convention TEC Polity & Canons* Christian Life / Church LifeParish MinistryMinistry of the Ordained* TheologyEthics / Moral TheologyPastoral Theology

Posted January 26, 2013 at 7:00 am [Printer Friendly] [Print w/ comments]
Registered members must log in to comment.

Next entry (above): An ENS Article on the South Carolina Order to Refrain from Assuming the Diocese’s Identity

Previous entry (below): (ABP) In Ohio Baptists host Episcopalians and use wine for Communion

Return to blog homepage

Return to Mobile view (headlines)