(First Things On the Square) Wesley Smith—The Coercive Freedom of Choice

Posted by Kendall Harmon

We are becoming a society in which “choice” and self-defined identities trump once-common values and traditional beliefs. But contrary to the rhetoric of its defenders, this shift is not a simple advance for freedom. The privileging of “choice” above all else in fact requires re-engineering the human person and society as a whole, and this will inevitably involve a great deal of coercion.

Wesley J. SmithThis shift, if it didn’t begin with Roe v. Wade, could be said to have been dramatically accelerated by it. Despite continuing opposition by over 50 percent of the American people, abortion is now universally available, in some places through the ninth month. Two states have legalized assisted suicide for the terminally ill—once strictly prohibited by the Hippocratic Oath. Now, some doctors actively collaborate in lethally overdosing their patients.

Advocacy for legalizing “after birth” abortion—e.g., infanticide—as a natural extension of the abortion right is growing more prominent, and not just among acolytes of Princeton’s Peter Singer. A Florida Planned Parenthood representative, opposing a bill that would require medical treatment for an infant who survives abortion, said the choice to care for the child should be a private one made between a mother and her doctor.

Read it all.

Filed under: * Culture-WatchChildrenHistoryLaw & Legal IssuesLife EthicsPhilosophyPsychologyReligion & CultureScience & TechnologyYoung Adults* Religion News & CommentaryOther FaithsSecularism* TheologyAnthropologyEthics / Moral Theology

0 Comments
Posted May 7, 2013 at 3:44 pm [Printer Friendly] [Print w/ comments]
Registered members must log in to comment.




Next entry (above): An LA Times article on the Recent Decision involving Saint James Anglican and TEC/ Los Angeles

Previous entry (below): (CNBC) Sex Superbug Could Be ‘Worse Than AIDS’

Return to blog homepage

Return to Mobile view (headlines)