(Washington Post) Cardinal Donald Wuerl—Debating the nature of marriage

Posted by Kendall Harmon

A culture based on the truth of marriage affirms that men and women are equally important, that they have equal dignity but are not the same. The recognition of the difference between a man and a woman is neither discrimination nor bigotry. It is a statement of reality, of fact.

What the court has determined demonstrates the limits of civil legislation. We all recognize that the word “marriage” is being used in many different ways. All that civil government can do is address the legal consequences of any specific union it has chosen to call marriage. While there are many other words to describe other human unions, “marriage,” in its intrinsic meaning and basic integrity, will continue to be understood by most people as the coming together of a man and woman committed to live together with the possibility to generate and raise children.

Far from settling the debate over the meaning of marriage, the Supreme Court decisions have simply reminded all of us that there is a great difference between what a law can decree and what God has created.

Read it all.

Filed under: * Culture-WatchLaw & Legal IssuesReligion & Culture* Religion News & CommentaryOther ChurchesRoman Catholic* TheologyAnthropologyEthics / Moral TheologyTheology: Scripture

0 Comments
Posted July 1, 2013 at 6:00 am [Printer Friendly] [Print w/ comments]
Registered members must log in to comment.




Next entry (above): (Christianity Today) The Right Side of History Is Full of Rewrites

Previous entry (below): PBS ’ Religion and Ethics Newsweekly—Religious Reaction to Same-Sex Marriage Decisions

Return to blog homepage

Return to Mobile view (headlines)