Even if true, the allegations are broadly the same as claiming that Ronald Reagan was being manipulated by Peggy Noonan or his other speech-writers.

This tendency to grasp at any angle in an attempt to discredit ... smacks of desperation.

The charges of American manipulation of African Archbishops were ‘another attempt to divert attention’ away from the root causes of the crisis of faith and order in the Anglican Communion, it said.

I think that nails the big fuss about the speech rather squarely.

One is tempted to add “deliberate, malicious desperation”.

Much ado about nothing.  It must have been a slow news day in the UK.

Meanwhile there is real news from Nigeria!  Readers should visit the Church of Nigeria website and see the amazing photos of the gathering of Nigerian bishops in Sokoto, a Nigerian state that embraces the Sharia code.  Sokoto is the home to the spiritual head of millions of Muslims in Nigeria, Sultan Muhammadu Saad Abubakar III.  There are photos of the Sultan in his white robes surrounded by many Primates in their purple shirts! Turning to Archbishop Akinola, the Sultan said, “If somebody tries to hit you because you are a Christian I will place myself in front of you so that they can hit me first!”

No greater love…

What a crock!  Just shows that the Archbishop is a wise and gracious man.  Anyone in his position would or at least should have such a letter reviewed by others.  And to agree to the revisions shows that he values the content more than his own pride of authorship.  Something in Proverbs comes to mind.  These people just want to do anything to put him down.  Kind of like the Democrats and president Bush.

Matt - the racist comes about because of the repeated “chicken dinner” type comments which suggest that the African primates are unable to make up their own mind. On this occasion the implication that   because the letter was typed on Bishop Minns wordprocessor it could not possibly be the work of Akinola and that Akinola was being led, were more of the same type.

Racism is alive and well in the TEC.

I too don’t see how this is “racist.”  However, I don’t see why the big fuss over this either.  Of course Minns has strong input with Akinola—we heard about that all over the reports from Dar es Salaam when Akinola reportedly went to confer with him regularly during the middle of meetings.  Getting advice or input doesn’t mean he’s incapable of doing things himself.

Matt Thompson and MargaretG,
While I do agree that there is an air of superiority in TEC’s pronouncements toward the Global South, and it does often contain more than a hint of racism, I think the “racist” cry is being heard far too often. 

TEC will never respect the Africans because TEC does not respect the word of God and the Africans do.

Perhaps part of the problem is the way certain factions, generally on the “left”, have casually tossed the term “racism” about over the past few decades.  It has taken on new meanings, probably inappropriately; but nevertheless, to paraphrase a Supreme Court justice, “we know it when we see it.”

Look at some of the (over)reactions to trivial things like sports commentators losing the jobs for saying that African-Americans have advantages in certain sports.  “Racist”, so off with his head.

I think Matt is generally right about this, it’s not true racism…  and yet, it is clearly racism as defined by entities such as TEC.

I think the “racist” reaction came from the very open implications in blogland, at least, that of course Abp. Akinola couldn’t have come up with the letter himself, he had to have a white man to tell him what to think.

I think “racism” may be lost in translation here.

To the American, the word nearly always means a black/white issue.  However, it’s been my impression that in Africa, the word has more of a connotation of the African race vs. the Western race. 

Thus, “racism” in the American sense is indeed a completely overblown charge.

However, if Canon Tunde used in the way I cite above, I frankly think he has a point.

It also reflects a double standard.

‘Racism’ is relative. My Ugandan friends tell me that one of the funniest things going is to see the expression on African-Americans’ faces when they finally figure out that Africans regard them as white[/].

EXACTLY my point, Bart Hall.

Matt, I appreciate that we are in “rought agreement” on this, but I still think that you’re not quite getting the semantics here.  To the African, blind, arrogant insensitivity from the West IS racism.  WE as Americans would never use that term bacause it’s got a very different conotation here. 

It’s just like hearing an American & a Brit discuss “football” - same language, same word - two different sports. I could continue to cite examples of this sort of linguistic jumble from both English & other languages, but you get the picture - “You keep using that word - I do not think it means what you think it means.”

And, to be honest, I am not sure Canon Tunde fully understands the charge he lobs when he uses that word with Americans. BUt the point is not the words used - the point is the attiturde expressed. And what we have here, Matt, as you so aptly expressed, is “Nigerians ... be[ing] prickly about “well-meaning” Westerners.”

And rightly so.

MJD_NV,
Perhaps the six-fingered man can ‘splain it better?