(Wash. Post) Chief Justice John Roberts dissents: Constitution ‘had nothing to do with it’

Posted by Kendall Harmon

Roberts's unequivocal disagreement is somewhat startling, especially as the conservative-leaning justice seemed to be searching for a middle ground just a few months ago during oral arguments on the case, reported The Washington Post's Robert Barnes.

The chief justice has a particular obligation "to try to achieve consensus," Roberts has said.

But Roberts didn't agree with the Supreme Court's 2013 decision to expand federal rights to legally married gay couples. And he made clear Friday that no consensus is worth a decision he feels oversteps the court's constitutional bounds.

Read it all.

Filed under:

0 Comments
Posted June 27, 2015 at 10:30 am [Printer Friendly] [Print w/ comments]
Registered members must log in to comment.




Next entry (above): (Local paper Editorial) Ending the same-sex marriage debate

Previous entry (below): (Patheos) Melinda Selmys—a lofty ideal of marriage split into 2 different kinds of relationships

Return to blog homepage

Return to Mobile view (headlines)