I don’t see why they need to constantly invoke the phony “We are causing Global Climate Change” mantra to get countries to clean up their air and water.  A simple Human Rights mandate would work just as well. 

This is the most telling point:
U.S. funding of adaptation efforts in the world’s poorest countries, which emit relatively little carbon dioxide but may be hardest hit by global warming because of their locale and lack of infrastructure and money.

Critics of ‘global warming initiatives’ have been saying for years (since the proposal of the flawed Kyoto treaty), that the measures will immesurably hurt the poor even though they have very little emissions, and will keep them in the status of ‘third world country’ due to technological restrictions.  I’ve posted some of their comments on past posts.

Glad to see others are finally realizing this.

“World To End Tomorrow: Women and Minorities Hardest Hit”

Anyone still reading down this far?

Here is a great article FIRE AND ICE chronicling the media coverage of ‘Global Climate Change hysteria’ since 1895!

short quote:

It was five years before the turn of the century and major media were warning of disastrous climate change. Page six of The New York Times was headlined with the serious concerns of “geologists.” Only the president at the time wasn’t Bill Clinton; it was Grover Cleveland. And the Times wasn’t warning about global warming – it was telling readers the looming dangers of a new ice age. 
 
    The year was 1895, and it was just one of four different time periods in the last 100 years when major print media predicted an impending climate crisis. Each prediction carried its own elements of doom, saying Canada could be “wiped out” or lower crop yields would mean “billions will die.”