Graham Kings Responds to Chris Sugden

Posted by Kendall Harmon

This ‘no longer trusting in the Archbishop of Canterbury’ matches Chris Sugden’s earlier article, ‘Not Schism but Revolution’, in Evangelicals Now (September 2007), where he stated, after a quotation from Bishop Bob Duncan:

In other words, since the Archbishop of Canterbury has not provided for the safe oversight of the orthodox in the United States, he has forfeited his role as the one who gathers the Communion.


The irony of this, is that the Presiding Bishop of the Southern Cone, Greg Venables, has been at pains to point out that he consulted with the Archbishop of Canterbury in September concerning the current events. At least he continues, it seems, to treat the Archbishop of Canterbury as one ‘who gathers the Communion’.

The consequential question resulting from Chris Sugden’s view concerning the Archbishop of Canterbury is: ‘Then who does gather the Communion?’ His view leaves a vacuum. It also means that the Primates’ Meeting can’t be gathered, since Canterbury presides at those meetings. It also means the Lambeth Conference can’t meet. Of the Four Instruments of Communion, that leaves only the Anglican Consultative Council and that is not seen as respresentative by him.


Read it all (the comment has a time stamp of 11:49 on November 28th).

Filed under: * Anglican - Episcopal- Anglican: CommentaryArchbishop of Canterbury Anglican ProvincesCono Sur [formerly Southern Cone]Episcopal Church (TEC)TEC Conflicts

0 Comments
Posted November 29, 2007 at 12:23 pm [Printer Friendly] [Print w/ comments]
Registered members must log in to comment.




Next entry (above): A Pastoral Statement from the Primate and Metropolitans of the Anglican Church of Canada

Previous entry (below): Recommended DVD Movie for the Holidays

Return to blog homepage

Return to Mobile view (headlines)