So, are we each entitled to our own theology?

“essentially allows the will of the (presbytery) to supersede the constitution of the Presbyterian Church (USA).”

Hmmmmm..sounds familiar for some reason.

Sounds like great news for the PCA—better start the building expansion projects now.

Meanwhile, if you want to pick up a PCUSA former church building in Minnesota cheap…just wait a couple of years.

Minnesota Presbyterians Struggle over Non-Celibate Same Sex Partnered Clergy

Where is the struggle?  Even though same-sex activity is inappropriate, over 71% of the folks voting appeared to have no problem in ignoring this.

Hate to say it, but here goes:
The governing bodies of many mainline churches are usually dominated by guilty-feeling people who want to assuage their affluent guilt by handing out goodies to the world and passing resolutions with little effect. That’s why GC 2009 will be a disaster for this Church. Like the PCUSA, TEC is dominated by people who are more progressively liberal than the people back home who will be forced to back their lofty delegations. I’ve noted that in the Diocese of Southwestern Virginia that the same ethnic minority has been voted as a GC delegate since 1789. He is notoriously liberal and glad of it. Everyone else’s affluent guilt keeps re-electing him. People with differing opinions don’t have the stomach to sit through deanery banter and have better things to do than to waste a Sunday afternoon watching liberals posture. That, too, is a problem.

So what, the Presbyterians are on their way down the tubes too.

#3 Conservative PCUSA people are not joining the PCA, mostly because Conservative PCUSA folk almost All affirm and support the ordination of women which PCA does not allow. (sigh…same song different tune) They are choosing to go here instead:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evangelical_Presbyterian_Church_(United_States)

So, are we each entitled to our own theology?

Finally!  Someone who gets it!

In other words Bryan, everyone is their own moral center.

If “conservative” PCUSA members support women’s ordination, then they are not conservative.  It seems that they want to follow TE*.  How can a candidate for ordination conscientuously object to canons?  Ordination is not a right, you have to be called first, then go through postulancy. If you are found not to be genuinely called, you are not ordained.  How can you be genuinely called and object to the rules?

Hey, at least in the PCUSA, they say they object to the rules ahead of time. In the Episcopal Church, they agree to the rules and then ignore them. 

#10 A woman or anyone else can be called, go through discernment, have they call verified and recognized by others and come up against man made rules/canons. Canons are fallible and can be changed as they always have been. All churches, including Rome, change, update and alter their canons through the years to reflect new understandings or concensus. The Reformation and the Counter Reformation both are historical examples of the church needing to rethink some of her rules/ideas/canons.

Sadly, the night of decadence and immorality continues to fall on the once strongly moral churches of the Protestant Reformation.