seems to be working pretty well.

That’s all well and good, but do I still have to do whatever formatting correctly?  What a bummer!  heheheh

as good a <strikethrough>place</strikethrough> to try this as any.

Words:  we think the code you want is simply “strike”

thus
[strike]text[/strike]

for this effect: text

test  test  test

test

seems to work

We’ve changed the “formatting help” instructions in the comment window from angle brackets to square brackets.  That should help remind folks, including this elf!, to use the square brackets. 

I confess after 4 years of blogging, I’m finding it hard to make the switch LOL!

How about anchors with short links or longer ones with arguments?  Anchors seem to work if you use ‘+’ instead of ‘’%20’’ (or just plain spaces) for spaces in their arguments.

Square brackets don’t seem to work with either anchor though:
[a href=“http://www.kendallharmon.net/t19”]short links[/a]
[a href=“http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=titus+1:9&version=47”]longer ones with arguments[/a]

The formatting help above he comment block is much appreciated.
Thanks, Elves!

Don, hmmm.  We got square brackets to work for a link a few minutes ago and over the past few days as we’ve been trying to test this out.

Did you try “preview” before you hit submit on your comment?  Oddly enough, hitting preview sometimes seems to affect the outcome badly.  I’ve had code (i.e. the desired formatting) show up correctly in preview and then incorrectly (as code) after I hit submit.  Truly frustrating!

Links had been generally a bit less problematic, especially since the software WILL automatically format an unformatted link.  I.E. in the line below, I’m just pasting the T19 URL without any code:

http://www.kendallharmon.net/t19/

Perhaps angle brackets are better for the links.  We’ll keep experimenting here.  And we’ll keep trying to see what works best for links with embedded spaces in the address.

#8 Br_er, we can’t take credit for that.  It’s been here all along. 

Greg G. is the one to thank. He set it up. (It’s over in the Stand Firm comments box too.) We just added the line about square brackets working better, and switched the code to show the square brackets instead of the angle brackets that had been there.

Testing the code for a long link with argument:

1. No formatting, just paste in the URL:
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=titus+1:9&version=47

2. Angle brackets:
Titus1:9

3. Square brackets:
[a href=“http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=titus+1:9&version=47”]Titus1:9[/a]

Not hitting preview and hoping I got my code right the first time around!

Ok, based on the above several comments, I’ll change the post to note that angle brackets should still be used for anchor links.  Square brackets have worked a few times for me, but angle brackets seem better for links.

Hi, Elves.  I did preview my stuff for comment #7, and in the process, noted that things would change in the box after I clicked the “Preview” button.  Mostly it was stuff like HTML code getting changed to its character equivalent (e.g., percent-20 changed to a space character).  It seems like it probably makes a round-trip to the server and back, translating some things in the process before displaying the formatted comment and rediplaying the text in the edit box.  It also wouldn’t surprise me if different browsers see different behavior (I generally use Firefox).  Isn’t the world of HTML wunnerful?

Don, yes the comment preview window is its own template and so does do the round trip to the server you mentioned. 

It will be interesting to see if we have the same problem with square brackets for formatting even when folks hit preview.  Let’s give it a try.

I’m bolding this with square brackets
I’m bolding this with angle brackets

blockquote with square brackets:

It also wouldn’t surprise me if different browsers see different behavior (I generally use Firefox).  Isn’t the world of HTML “wunnerful?”

blockquote with angle brackets:

It also wouldn’t surprise me if different browsers see different behavior (I generally use Firefox).  Isn’t the world of HTML “wunnerful?”

Ok, and hitting preview…

——
All looks very good in preview.  (and yes, we’re using Firefox too).
How will it work when I hit submit?

I wonder if the code the blog wants is BB (bulletin board) code, rather than html. 

BB code for an anchored link: Tiger’s baby
OR, html for an anchred link:
Tiger’s baby

ooo, they both worked… BB uses the square brackets [ ] instead of parentheses (url=url.youwant)text(/url).  It’s a little simpler overall than html.  A BB code primer can be found here.

Ok, let’s try it:

Words Matter is a <strike>do-do head at html</strike> genuis

Interminably cool. And the preview works too! If I can remember to use it, maybe I won’t post so many coding errors. 

And the smileys are still the best! 

I made a suggestion to the elves a while ago but I haven’t heard from them so I put it to you. I often can’t remember which entry I commented on so I suggested to them that each headline have a click-on thingamabob that will simply list who has made an entry. This way you can check quickly whether you commented or not and can see which blogs to avoid because the speakers you earnestly wish to avoid are there. Larry
Don’t you think this would be useful?

Larry, if you click on the “Your Account” link up by the welcome text (upper right), you can look at your account information.  One of the links there shows which posts you’ve subscribed to, which could be a good proxy for which you’ve commented on.

Larry, we have not figured out any way to do something like what you’re asking for.  And there have been other more urgent priorities.
As Don mentions, you can choose to subscribe to various comment threads and receive e-mails whenever someone else comments.  But that can lead to a lot of e-mail in a hurry.

In the meantime, may we suggest you get in the habit of viewing the recent comments page:
http://www.kendallharmon.net/t19/index.php/t19/comments/

And using your browser’s search feature (explained here)  to search for your screen name (Larry Morse) you will then quickly be able to find each thread you’ve commented on and click on the link to the article to view any more recent comments.

One other idea:  get in the habit of bookmarking threads you want to reread.  Right click on the title of the article (or the link button in the gray box that says how many comments there are) and choose “Add to Favorites” or “Bookmark this Link”  (the menu choices will depend on what web browser you are using.)  You can then go to your favorites window in your web browser and see a list of the T19 articles you are wanting to revisit to follow any new comments.

For now that’s all we can offer, I’m afraid.

Thank’ee. ladies of enlightenment.  The Lar

Is there a primer on emoticons? sometimes they work, sometimes not, but there seem to be a lot used that I don’t know how to do! (#18, for example).

#23, jim, see the little “smileys” link in the comment box (below the HTML help section and above the comment text box)?

Click on it and a pop-up window will appear giving you 30 or 40 smilies to choose from

cool… thanks.