Cliff Asness Voices In On The Transaction Tax

Posted by Kendall Harmon

Should Congress and the President find enough appeal in HR 4191 to enact it, there are three possible outcomes. The first is that there are enough loopholes that the tax raises little money but has unfortunate side effects like driving jobs and tax revenues overseas or inflating the balance sheets of banks. The second is that there are no meaningful loopholes but, surprisingly, people still trade a lot and enormous taxes are paid, in which case we expect stock prices to fall dramatically. The third, and most likely, is that there aren’t enough exemptions and investors react by sharply reducing trading activity, so there is little revenue but great harm to the market and the economy. Whichever of these occurs, the sponsors of the Bill will face a hard time explaining how, when aiming to shoot the banks, they shot their constituents who will then pay for the next Wall Street bailout.

Read it all.

Filed under: * Economics, PoliticsEconomyStock MarketTaxes

0 Comments
Posted December 15, 2009 at 12:48 pm [Printer Friendly] [Print w/ comments]
Registered members must log in to comment.




Next entry (above): A Resolution of the Standing Committee of the Diocese of Dallas

Previous entry (below): David Bebbington: Tobin himself abandoned the idea so why is the EU even debating this tax?

Return to blog homepage

Return to Mobile view (headlines)