| May 2012 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
click on a date to see all the day's entries
About TitusOneNine
Old Titusonenine site (Jan04-May07)Kendall's Bio
Kendall's e-mail (replace -at- with @)
"Elves" e-mail (blog admin)
A free floating commentary on culture, politics, economics, and religion based on a passionate commitment to the truth and a desire graciously to refute that which is contrary to it….
"He must hold firm to the sure word as taught, so that he may be able to give instruction in sound doctrine and also to confute those who contradict it."
--Titus 1:9, Revised Standard Version
Blog Tips & Info
Info to help you learn your way around the new blog, and posts where you can report problems or offer suggestions
Mobile-friendly view (blog headlines): Click HerePrint-friendly view of all articles: Click Here
Recent Comments Page:
Click Here
Registration & Login Help
Blog Tips Series
Categories
The above list is limited to "parent" categories. To see the entire category index and select specific sub-categories, click on "Full Category Index"
Full Category Index
Monthly Archives
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007

Anglican / Episcopal RSS Feed
©2012 Kendall S. Harmon. All rights reserved.
TitusOneNine Links Page
I. Anglican / Episcopal Resources & Links
1. Important Documents
documents are in chronological order, most recent first
Also, don't miss:
2. Websites & Blogs
A. Official websites
B. Anglican / Episcopal News
C. Anglican / Episcopal Blogs
By no means exhaustive. Let us know what we've missed
Previous versions of Titusonenine:
NORTH AMERICAN ANGLICANS:
Reasserters' Blogs:
Reappraisers' Blogs
INTERNATIONAL ANGLICAN BLOGS & BLOGGERS
BLOGGING BISHOPS (US & Overseas)
II. General Resources & Links
YET more links coming soon...! including Non-Anglican links
A dozen girls, some perched awkwardly with their pregnant bellies flush against the desks, were struggling over a high school geometry assignment on a recent afternoon.
No pencils, no textbooks, no Pythagorean theorem. Instead, they sewed quilts.
That is what passes for math in one of New York City’s four high schools for pregnant girls, this one in Harlem. “It ties into geometry,” said Patricia Martin, the principal. “They’re cutting shapes.”
Created in the 1960s, when pregnant girls were such pariahs that they were forced to leave school until their babies were born, the city school system’s four pregnancy schools — or P-schools, as they are obliquely referred to — have lived on, their population dwindling to just 323 students from 1,500 in the late 1960s.
They have been marked by abysmal test scores, poor attendance and inadequate facilities, and even some of their own administrators say they suspect that most of their students are pushed there by other schools because they are failing academically. In place of proms and computer labs, they have Mother’s Day parties and day care centers with cribs lining the walls.
Now in recognition of their failure, the city plans to shut them down at the end of the school year as part of a sweeping reorganization to be announced today of the alternative school district, which also includes an array of vocational, technical and dropout programs for students who have struggled in traditional settings.
“It’s a separate but unequal program,” acknowledges Cami Anderson, the superintendent whose district includes the Program for Pregnant Students, as it is formally called. “The girls get pushed out of their original high schools, they don’t come to class and they don’t gain ground in terms of credits.”
Read it all.
Filed under: * Culture-Watch Education

|
2. Deja Vu wrote:
They are closing the “separate but equal” schools because pregnancy, childbirth and day care for the babies have been integrated into the regular high schools. May 31, 2:32 pm | [comment link] |
|
3. e-piscopalian wrote:
This is a pathetic indicator of how poorly sex-ed works when tauthg in school. Sex is a topic that is the responsibility of parents, with the exception of a small percentage of youngsters. When I was in high school, during the mid-sixties, the unintended pregnancy rate was about 5%. This rate skyrocketed with the broader distribution of The Pill and Roe v. Wade. Young people CAN be obstinately abstinate when there’s a compelling reason to be so. Duh! May 31, 5:31 pm | [comment link] |
|
4. SouthCoast wrote:
#1. Frankly, that depends. I’ve had to use one whale of a lot of practical geometric when working with quilt patterns. And the patterns that my un- or under-educated foremothers devised by intuition and instinct still blow me away. May 31, 6:16 pm | [comment link] |
|
5. Dale Rye wrote:
Re #3: Teaching sex-ed in schools did not reduce the number of parents who took responsibility for their children. That was already extremely low. May 31, 11:25 pm | [comment link] |
|
6. e-piscopalian wrote:
I can’t make sense of your comment, Mr. Rye. In the post-WWII era about which I wrote, the 50’ & 60’s, and in previous eras, parents had 100% responsibility for their children, and MOST parent’s taught their children that abstinence before marriage was the norm. Most people married between 18 and 24 years of age and MOST marriages did not end in divorce. Marriage was seen as a commitment of both heart and will, unlike today. Teaching sex-ed in school INCREASED the number of kids who dared to have sex for the reason that the more daring kids tend to be the more popular kids. Do you have kids? I do. In addition, my parents had 5 kids, NONE of which was ever promiscuous. (The word ‘promiscuous was replaced by ‘sexually active’ to remove the stigma associated with recreational sex) Sex ed has put the parents at a remove from what their children are taught about sex. Therefore they learn to use condoms, learn about all kinds of sexual practices most would not dream up on their own, and put pressure on the kids to practice what they are learning about. It’s evil nonsense. June 1, 7:35 am | [comment link] |
|
7. clayton wrote:
Do you have the stats for how many of those 18 to 24 year old girls were pregnant at their weddings? The empire waist dress wasn’t just a fashion statement for a lot of brides, and there were a lot of very large “premature” babies born to my cousins. Don’t go idealizing the good old days without looking under the hood at what was really happening. June 2, 1:05 am | [comment link] |
|
8. e-piscopalian wrote:
Of course there are statistics regarding these issues, and of course I have seen many statistics. However, the fact that many people refuse to believe certain things does not mean they are not so. Though there is plenty of statistical evidence for what I have written above, I don’t need statistics to tell me that the culture today is almost the complete inverse of the culture in which I grew up. Prior to the early seventies, for example, most people were clearly shocked at the very idea of unwed cohabitation. Young people who cohabited HID it from their families. Pregnant girls went to live with relatives or went to line and finish school in a home for unwed girls. This may shock some people today, but it was simply a rational consequence for transgressive acts. Nowadays the things that shock people tend to be associated with ‘bigoted’ comments, where bigotry is actually involved or not. Do you need statistics to tell you that? I also know the difference between anecdotal and statistical evidence. Nevetheless, most of us do not have to seek statistical proof for everything we know. A lot of what we know we can’t help but absorb through living in the culture we create. Nevertheless, why don’t you make your own investigation if you don’t want to believe me? June 2, 7:13 am | [comment link] |
Next entry (above): Former Archbishop of Canterbury George Carey Offers his Thoughts
Previous entry (below): Communique from the Anglican - Lutheran International Commission
Return to blog homepage
Return to Mobile view (headlines)


Well, when you’re sewing quilts instead of learning about REAL geometry, then we see what the REAL problem is…
May 31, 11:30 am | [comment link]