| May 2012 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
click on a date to see all the day's entries
About TitusOneNine
Old Titusonenine site (Jan04-May07)Kendall's Bio
Kendall's e-mail (replace -at- with @)
"Elves" e-mail (blog admin)
A free floating commentary on culture, politics, economics, and religion based on a passionate commitment to the truth and a desire graciously to refute that which is contrary to it….
"He must hold firm to the sure word as taught, so that he may be able to give instruction in sound doctrine and also to confute those who contradict it."
--Titus 1:9, Revised Standard Version
Blog Tips & Info
Info to help you learn your way around the new blog, and posts where you can report problems or offer suggestions
Mobile-friendly view (blog headlines): Click HerePrint-friendly view of all articles: Click Here
Recent Comments Page:
Click Here
Registration & Login Help
Blog Tips Series
Categories
The above list is limited to "parent" categories. To see the entire category index and select specific sub-categories, click on "Full Category Index"
Full Category Index
Monthly Archives
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007

Anglican / Episcopal RSS Feed
©2012 Kendall S. Harmon. All rights reserved.
TitusOneNine Links Page
I. Anglican / Episcopal Resources & Links
1. Important Documents
documents are in chronological order, most recent first
Also, don't miss:
2. Websites & Blogs
A. Official websites
B. Anglican / Episcopal News
C. Anglican / Episcopal Blogs
By no means exhaustive. Let us know what we've missed
Previous versions of Titusonenine:
NORTH AMERICAN ANGLICANS:
Reasserters' Blogs:
Reappraisers' Blogs
INTERNATIONAL ANGLICAN BLOGS & BLOGGERS
BLOGGING BISHOPS (US & Overseas)
II. General Resources & Links
YET more links coming soon...! including Non-Anglican links
First, on the negative side from Josh Marshall:
It's a daring pick but I think a very weak pick. I'm perfectly happy with it. Palin is in the midst of a reasonably serious scandal in her home state. Her brother-in-law is a state trooper who is in the midst of an ugly custody battle with her sister. And she's accused of getting the state police to fire him. Recently she was forced to admit that one of her aides had done this, though she insists she didn't know.
Then secondly, a very different view from Noah Millman:
[John] McCain's choice of Sarah Palin (assuming it's confirmed) is a brilliant first counter-stroke. She helps the ticket on so many different fronts: she gives women who are angry about Hillary being passed over another reason to vote McCain; she gives fence-sitting whites who feel they "ought" to vote for Obama because of the historic nature of his candidacy an excuse to find history on the other side; she burnishes McCain's credentials as an independent, reform candidate; she restores McCain's credibility on energy and environmental issues, where Obama personally feels most comfortable going on the attack; she will generate enthusiasm among evangelicals among whom Obama was hoping to make inroads; she absolutely locks down the gun-rights vote (where McCain needed to play a bit of defense against Barr); she helps McCain in the Mountain West (Colorado and Montana) where he cannot afford to lose any states (except New Mexico); she neutralizes Biden in the debates (if he comes out zinging, he'll seem ungentlemanly); and, most important, she makes McCain seem bold, future-oriented, and in control of his Administration, where Obama has seemed timid, defensive and unable to control his own party.
Filed under: * Economics, Politics US Presidential Election 2008

|
2. Hoskyns wrote:
Well, if even half the stuff in the Wikipedia article on her is true we could be in for interesting times. She sounds quite a zesty piece of work: “She hunts, eats moose hamburger, ice fishes, rides snowmobiles, and owns a float plane. Palin holds a lifetime membership with the National Rifle Association. In December 2007, Palin posed for a photo spread in the fashion magazine Vogue.” What more could you possibly want in a VP with a pretty good chance to lead the free world during her tenure? August 29, 4:00 pm | [comment link] |
|
3. David Fischler wrote:
Josh Marshall is peddling unthoughtful fluff. The “scandal” was manufactured starting about two weeks ago when it looked like she was getting serious consideration from McCain. In fact, her brother-in-law was fired for being drunk on duty, and she did nothing to get him fired. He did that quite nicely himself, thank you. When you consider all the stuff in Obama’s past (Ayers, Wright, Rezko, etc.), for the left to be shouting “scandal!” about something like this is just laughable. August 29, 4:23 pm | [comment link] |
|
4. Gretta wrote:
As the mom of a one year old, I’m quite curious how the Republicans are going to deal with the fact that she is the mother of a three month old, special needs child. It is certainly great to showcase her pro-life views. Yet, it leaves me wondering how you both adequately mother this special child (who presumably would be more needy than a baby without special needs) and run for the second highest office in the country. Does she bring a three month old on the campaign trail? Does she leave the child at home with her husband while she campaigns for days on end in the lower 48? Maybe it isn’t exactly politically correct to mention this, but I have to admit that this just doesn’t seem quite right to me. It makes me a bit squidgy - particularly coming from the party that has touted its own family values. Am I the only one that thinks this? August 29, 4:24 pm | [comment link] |
|
5. the snarkster wrote:
Well, I don’t know how much she helps McCain. We’ll know shortly. Having said that, I don’t think she will hurt him at all. At first glance, I think I like her. As for the bro-in-law thing, I expect the McCain people looked at that pretty closely and I don’t think they would have gone with her if there was anything remotely smelly about the firing. They ain’t stupid. the snarkster August 29, 4:39 pm | [comment link] |
|
6. Red Bird wrote:
Both teams have an experienced member and an inexperienced one. The difference is that the Republicans have their experienced member at the top of the ticket whereas the Democrats have theirs at the bottom. August 29, 4:45 pm | [comment link] |
|
7. Eastern Anglican wrote:
I suppose you can call a 2 year gov inexperienced, but at least during her tenure she has tried to govern while during BO’s tenure he’s been running for prez. I’ll take 2 years of inexperienced gov over 2 years of running for prez while preening and saying i"t aint about me.” (I know BO would use better English, “I have the audacity to hope that this talk about changing change is not about me!” August 29, 4:56 pm | [comment link] |
|
8. Clueless wrote:
sure, bring the baby along! There would be some great photo ops for the McCain team. August 29, 5:18 pm | [comment link] |
|
9. Pam C. wrote:
Gretta, I had the same thoughts when I heard the news. I am concerned that her choice to advance her political career will hurt her child. Babies need their moms. I can’t see how she can nurture and bond with her baby while running along the campaign trail. I know she must have the worlds most supportive and incredible husband, and a great support system but babies need mom. Just my opinion. August 29, 5:22 pm | [comment link] |
|
10. drjoan wrote:
I for one am delighted! Here is a woman who is unashamed about her older son in the Army and her younger son who is an infant. Oh, yes, and that younger son is a Downs baby. That’s just how “important” that characteristic is. Don’t let folks tell you that she has to give up everything to care for a “special needs” child. She has five kids and she and her husband provide parenting to each according to their needs and to all with love—that’s obvious. |
|
11. Pam C. wrote:
from my #9 above I will add that from what I have seen, Sarah Palin appears to be an exciting, very strategic choice. It will be an interesting couple of months August 29, 5:57 pm | [comment link] |
|
12. Now Orthodox wrote:
She has “little experience” having been a governor for 2 years….? Please! If this lady has reared 5 children (19 years to 6 months) she has experience! Her record in Alaska for cleaning up state government seems to be outstanding (getting rid of the jet the previous governor used and driving herself around sounds more “middle class” than Obama’s 4.7 million dollar income does). Pro-life, pro-energy (Biden was against the Alaskan pipeline that has supplied 15 billion barrels of oil to our economy), pro-growth, I think this lady gets it! I think also a great strategic move by McCain’s camp and a real problem for Barrack (and roll) Obama. November will tell. BTW…I can’t wait to see VP debates….I think it will be “poor Joe” time. August 29, 6:10 pm | [comment link] |
|
13. Jeffersonian wrote:
I expected Palin to be tapped for Veep, and I’m very pleased she was. Can you say a little about why? -Ed. August 29, 6:13 pm | [comment link] |
|
15. rlw6 wrote:
Keep up the complaints, I would rather have a mother who gives life even if it might be inconvient in the eyes of some than some one who sees babies as punishment. I would rather have a vice president who has been the commander of a state national guard and an effective govenor than a president that has spent his time in the senate to run for office. As someone who has been in combat I would follow this women the only thing I would be embaresed about would be that she is a better shot than I am. I will proudly suppor this ticket something I could not say yesterday. paul August 29, 6:34 pm | [comment link] |
|
16. Jeffersonian wrote:
Sure. She’s a libertarian-minded conservative, she’s pro-life, she’s arrived in high office through a mix of very public anti-corruption measures at several levels and populist initiatives in her state (one that has some incredibly slimy Republican wire-pullers in positions of power), she’s a good public speaker, quick on her feet and has a compelling personal story to tell. Politically, I think it helps McCain to have all these excellent qualities in a female running mate, particularly after the incredibly shabby treatment Obama and the DNC gave Hillary. August 29, 6:37 pm | [comment link] |
|
17. St. Cuervo wrote:
I’m optimistic but we’ll know a lot more in two weeks after she has been in the public spotlight for a bit. She needs our prayers (regardless of whether or not you will vote for her). August 29, 6:41 pm | [comment link] |
|
18. Passing By wrote:
“I know she must have the worlds most supportive and incredible husband, and a great support system but babies need mom”. They do, and as a mother of four under the age of 10, I think I know a little about that, too. My husband loves his career so it is me who has chosen, happily, to be a stay-at-home mother. But, don’t assume that just because Governor Palin is busy with many responsibilities that she doesn’t mother her children. It’s true that both she and my sister-in-law, a nationally-known Hospice physician who runs a large county-wide hospice and gives conferences and talks all over the country, probably have husbands from Heaven, but they both seem to be mothers who find a way to make the time. Plus, there are many stay-at-home dads out there who do a beautiful job. My sister-in-law’s kids are 14, 12, and 6 and they are some of the nicest, most well-adjusted kids I know. They love their mom but are also grateful to have a stay-at-home dad, because they say they get to talk to their dad a lot more than most kids do. Of course, my sister-in-law is out of the house way more, but she still does a quality job. Please give the dads credit when you should—personally I don’t agree with hired help raising one’s kids, but dads and moms can do equally good jobs as primary caregivers. You go, Governor Palin!!
|
|
19. Katherine wrote:
Can anyone point me to liberal criticism of the Obamas both campaigning all over the country while their daughters are only ten and six (or thereabouts)? Mrs. Obama has been heavily involved in the political rallies and speechmaking and travel. August 29, 9:17 pm | [comment link] |
|
20. sophy0075 wrote:
I am delighted with Senator McCain’s VP selection: May God bless Gov Palin and her family - whether or not she and Sen McCain win the White House! August 29, 10:26 pm | [comment link] |
|
21. Belle wrote:
It appears that Palin has accomplished more (particularly in reform) in her two years as governer than Biden has in his entire career… My 20 year old daughter, who is also a member of the NRA and a minority conservative on her California college campus now has an excellent role model. August 30, 12:39 am | [comment link] |
|
22. Umbridge wrote:
Children need their dads just like they need their moms. What about Joe Biden? He’s been in politics for 35 years. Do you think that maybe he did some campaigning while he had a new child back at home who needed bonding with his dad? When the Dems bring up the same argument about the baby needing his mom, it will backfire…and offend many of the working mothers out there. August 30, 8:48 am | [comment link] |
|
23. libraryjim wrote:
Umbridge, Which is why when a Republican is suspected of sexual misconduct, he is hounded out of office, but a Democrat in a similar situation is immediately put up for re-election! August 30, 5:39 pm | [comment link] |
Next entry (above): Living Church: Archbishop Venables Comments on the GAFCON Primates Communique
Previous entry (below): Naomi Schafer Riley--Defend the Orphan: An Age-Old Christian Lesson Gets a New Lease on Life
Return to blog homepage
Return to Mobile view (headlines)


i had never heard of this lady before a recent email from a wildlife organization; they were fighting her about the eradication of wolves, so i don’t know how she helps mccain on the environmental issues, unless they are the ‘drill and kill and all else be damned’ conservative issues.
August 29, 3:48 pm | [comment link]i always liked mccain when i lived in arizona but have been disappointed in him during this campaign. also if he kicks the bucket we will have this 44 yr old gov of 2 years running the country!!!