Statement from Gene Robinson on the Episcopal elections in Los Angeles

Posted by Kendall Harmon

From here:

The people of the Diocese of Los Angeles have elected two extraordinarily gifted priests to serve them as Suffragan Bishops. They have chosen the two people who, in their minds, and with the guidance of the Holy Spirit, are best suited for this ministry, and one of them happens to be a lesbian. But let us be clear: it is Mary Glasspool's experience, skills and faith which will make her a good bishop, and are the reason for her election. Rightly so, the people of Los Angeles have not let current arguments over homosexuality or threats to “unity” impair their choosing the best persons for these ministries.

This is the inclusive Church we declared at this summer’s General Convention we would be, following God’s call to us as best we can discern it, and we are now living into that calling. I am delighted over the elections of Diane Bruce and Mary Glasspool and, upon consent by the wider church, look forward to welcoming them both into the House of Bishops.




Filed under: * Anglican - Episcopal • Episcopal Church (TEC) • TEC Bishops • TEC Conflicts • TEC Conflicts: Los Angeles • Instruments of Unity • Sexuality Debate (in Anglican Communion) • Same-sex blessings

11 Comments
Posted December 7, 2009 at 8:26 am [Printer Friendly] [Print w/ comments]



1. Br_er Rabbit wrote:

Apropos. “Unity” in scare quotes is diametrically opposed to the “inclusive church.”

December 7, 8:36 am | [comment link]
2. LumenChristie wrote:

V Gene said:

This is the inclusive Church we declared at this summer’s General Convention we would be

Yep.  He stated a fact.  But Episcopalians aren’t particularly good at facing facts, are we.

This is the church that Episcopalians live in as long as they remain in TEC.  Either that’s ok, and you live with it OR…...

Or what?  Complacency = compliance.

Just holding a few meetings and writing some nice theological reflections makes no real difference to any of the people doing these things.  At all.

December 7, 8:40 am | [comment link]
3. MarkTXK wrote:

You said it, LumenChristie.  One who is pretending that he is part of a faithful minority in TEC at this point is doing nothing but funding the sin-blessing factory.  Dear Leader praises your efforts!

December 7, 9:36 am | [comment link]
4. majorinsight wrote:

As we say at work: “Silence is consent.”  My experience says that polite silence will be order of the day, and the ostriches will return to their usual posture.

Grady

December 7, 10:00 am | [comment link]
5. pcnelson wrote:

Why is it that so many of our trusted leaders feel the need to say “But let us/me be clear…”?  Rather like “But truthfully…”

December 7, 10:55 am | [comment link]
6. Fr. Dale wrote:

Rightly so, the people of Los Angeles have not let current arguments over homosexuality or threats to “unity” impair their choosing the best persons for these ministries.

So now TEC is both heretical and schismatic. I guess TEC is now using the Timothy Geithner method of candidate selection.

December 7, 11:09 am | [comment link]
7. A Senior Priest wrote:

For some reason, I sincerely doubt that either of them are particularly ‘gifted’,  neither as priests, nor soi-disant bishops.

December 7, 11:11 am | [comment link]
8. wvparson wrote:

“This is an inclusive Church” writes the Bishop of New Hampshire. Note the capital “C”.  Across the board from “Mutual Ministry” affirmations about the shape of ministry, mutual recognition of ecclesial entities which do not claim to be in the historic ministerial succession, devaluation of the apostolic role of the House of Bishops, the co-equality of the presiding officers of General Convention, the omni-competency of General Convention, and the new title of our church with its pretentions to universal jurisdiction as a “denomination”, the deposition of bishops moving to another Anglican Province and the sort of language used above by Bishop Robinson combine to delineate a journey from Reformed Catholicism in the Anglican Tradition to some form of discreet religion, “made in America”!

December 7, 11:16 am | [comment link]
9. Joshua 24:15 wrote:

The Inclusive Church (TM)... can’t seem to find that listed in my phone book.  Is that a Christian denomination?

December 7, 12:23 pm | [comment link]
10. Old Soldier wrote:

Josh
Go to the yellow pages and look under idiots.

December 7, 4:37 pm | [comment link]
11. athan-asi-us wrote:

Satan is rubbing his hands with glee.

December 8, 3:14 pm | [comment link]
Registered members must log in to comment.



Next entry (above): (London) Times Editorial on Copenhagen: The Summit of Ambition

Previous entry (below): John Mark Reynolds--An Odious Law: Uganda and Homosexuality

Return to blog homepage

Return to Mobile view (headlines)