| May 2012 | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | ||
click on a date to see all the day's entries
About TitusOneNine
Old Titusonenine site (Jan04-May07)Kendall's Bio
Kendall's e-mail (replace -at- with @)
"Elves" e-mail (blog admin)
A free floating commentary on culture, politics, economics, and religion based on a passionate commitment to the truth and a desire graciously to refute that which is contrary to it….
"He must hold firm to the sure word as taught, so that he may be able to give instruction in sound doctrine and also to confute those who contradict it."
--Titus 1:9, Revised Standard Version
Blog Tips & Info
Info to help you learn your way around the new blog, and posts where you can report problems or offer suggestions
Mobile-friendly view (blog headlines): Click HerePrint-friendly view of all articles: Click Here
Recent Comments Page:
Click Here
Registration & Login Help
Blog Tips Series
Categories
The above list is limited to "parent" categories. To see the entire category index and select specific sub-categories, click on "Full Category Index"
Full Category Index
Monthly Archives
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007

Anglican / Episcopal RSS Feed
©2012 Kendall S. Harmon. All rights reserved.
TitusOneNine Links Page
I. Anglican / Episcopal Resources & Links
1. Important Documents
documents are in chronological order, most recent first
Also, don't miss:
2. Websites & Blogs
A. Official websites
B. Anglican / Episcopal News
C. Anglican / Episcopal Blogs
By no means exhaustive. Let us know what we've missed
Previous versions of Titusonenine:
NORTH AMERICAN ANGLICANS:
Reasserters' Blogs:
Reappraisers' Blogs
INTERNATIONAL ANGLICAN BLOGS & BLOGGERS
BLOGGING BISHOPS (US & Overseas)
II. General Resources & Links
YET more links coming soon...! including Non-Anglican links
I never thought that I'd be in favor of expanding instant replay for baseball, especially in the sport's most important games in the postseason. But then I never thought umpiring could get this bad.
It's time for baseball to seriously consider, and I would strongly suggest that it adopt, the use of instant replay for every postseason game.
No, not on balls and strikes. But there should be an extra umpire in a TV booth who communicates with the chief ump on the field. And that extra ump should have the authority, if he deems it necessary, to review any close or controversial play.
As a perfect illustration, in Game 3 of the World Series here on Saturday night, Alex Rodriguez of the Yankees hit a ball that was originally ruled a double off the top of the right field wall. For now, the only baseball plays that can have instant replay are just such "boundary calls." The umps assembled, left the field, consulted replay and got the call correct -- a two-run homer. But it took a few minutes. With a special-replay ump, the whole process might not have taken even one minute.
Read it all.
Filed under: * Culture-Watch Sports

|
2. NoVA Scout wrote:
Boswell is a superb baseball writer. He addresses Matthew’s concerns (which are legitimate) pretty well, especially in post-season play. It took too long to get this particular call right last evening, but if the use of replay were systematized, it could be done much more quickly. November 1, 8:01 am | [comment link] |
|
3. Stefano wrote:
I don’t know Boswell and I side with Matthew. the more mechanistic it becomes the less interesting it is . Its the ambiguities and complexities that are part of the game that make it wonderful and unique. November 1, 8:17 am | [comment link] |
|
4. Vatican Watcher wrote:
I would prefer rather a significant reform of the umpires themselves rather than adding another layer of supervision on what is already a slow game. Train umps and be able to hire and fire them based on performance and get rid of the old boys club before contemplating instant replay and all that comes with it. November 1, 10:48 am | [comment link] |
|
5. Archer_of_the_Forest wrote:
I hate instant replay. I seriously considered quitting watching college football when they adopted it. I have had an NCAA ref tell me personally off the record that it makes referees sloppy, even dishonest sometimes, because they know they now have a crutch to lean on. He even told me it is encouraged in some circles unofficially to intentionally make a wrong call if its a close play to make sure it gets reviewed. Baseball is long enough as it is, adding any form of instant replay to a game that already has no time limits will make a long game even longer, and that’s not good for baseball. Umpire and Ref mistakes happen; its part of the game. Players make errors; its part of the game. If you want an exact sport, become a science major. November 1, 10:02 pm | [comment link] |
|
6. Already left wrote:
What about last night’s game when the Phillies player never touched home plate? What if that had been a game decider? November 2, 11:38 am | [comment link] |
|
7. Matthew A (formerly mousestalker) wrote:
It happens. It would still happen with instant replay. All instant replay does is add yet more commercial breaks. Presently, umpires are critiqued after games and after the season based upon tapes of their calls. The exposure, humiliation and possible loss of job are enough incentives for them to try to get it right. As a sports fan, I hate bad calls. But they are part of life. November 3, 10:24 am | [comment link] |
Next entry (above): Episcopal Diocese of Tennessee sues to reclaim church
Previous entry (below): ENS: Minnesota diocese elects Brian Prior as next bishop
Return to blog homepage
Return to Mobile view (headlines)


I disagree very strongly. The instant replay is used extensively in college football. It kills momentum. It drains excitement. Injustice is part of life. The only thing replays should be used for is to keep umpires or referees honest. Let them be used after the game as a quality check.
Most of the ones I’ve seen have resulted in the man on the field’s judgment being upheld. The occasional error does not justify the introduction of a new element into game play.
November 1, 6:44 am | [comment link]