With little more than five weeks to Election Day, they may not have persuaded many voters to change their minds or helped undecided ones make a choice.
Despite the absence of a defining moment, the debate showcased the dueling candidates' temperaments and, particularly on foreign policy, highlighted their policy differences.
However, if voters were looking for a signal on how either would handle the economic meltdown as president, they were disappointed. Neither offered up a thoughtful prescription for addressing the worst economic meltdown in generations, or even much analysis on the proposed $700 billion government bailout.
"I wish they had. They were very cautiously evasive," said Michael Kevane, chairman of the economics department at Santa Clara University. "They were not very forward-looking. I wanted to hear how they thought the $700 billion should be divvied up."
Read it all.
To comment on this article: To article and comments
© 2016 Kendall S. Harmon. All rights reserved.
For original material from Titusonenine (such as articles and commentary by Dr. Harmon) permission to copy and distribute free of charge is granted, provided this notice, the logo, and the web site address are visible on all copies. For permission for use in for-profit publications, please email KSHarmon[at]mindspring[dot]com