NY Times Letters Respond to David Brooks on the Family in the Age of Possibility
Here is one:
David Brooks says the problem with society in this “age of possibility” is that people “go through adulthood perpetually trying to keep their options open.”Read them all.
But certainly it is possible to view this as an improvement over centuries of more “traditional” values, like denying the humanity of homosexuals; the subjugation and oppression of women; and institutionalized discrimination against pretty much every non-Anglo-Saxon ethnic group.
The various values and commitments to choose from are no less valid or moral for not being “traditional” (whatever that means). The two-parent family and “commitments to family, God, craft and country” might be lifestyle choices that work for some people, who are still free to pursue some or all of those ideals.
The difference now is that others won’t be forced into a life they either don’t want or can’t have, and they won’t be made to feel ashamed about whatever life they choose to live. This is progress.
Filed under: * Culture-Watch Children Globalization History Marriage & Family Psychology Religion & Culture Science & Technology Sociology
5 Comments
Posted November 20, 2012 at 6:45 am
The URL for this article is http://www.kendallharmon.net/t19/index.php/t19/article/46160/To comment on this article: To article and comments
© 2013 Kendall S. Harmon. All rights reserved.
For original material from Titusonenine (such as articles and commentary by Dr. Harmon) permission to copy and distribute free of charge is granted, provided this notice, the logo, and the web site address are visible on all copies. For permission for use in for-profit publications, please email KSHarmon[at]mindspring[dot]com
