Michael Lewitt: Wall Street’s Next Big Problem

Posted by Kendall Harmon

When I drove to the Beverly Hills offices of Drexel Burnham Lambert on Feb. 13, 1990, the last thing I expected to hear was that the investment bank where I worked was going under. Yet early that morning, we were told that the company was filing for bankruptcy. I was, to put it mildly, blown away. At the time, Drexel had $3.5 billion in assets and was the biggest underwriter of junk bonds.

It all seemed like a very big deal at the time. But what’s happening this week makes me pine for the good old days.

When Lehman Brothers filed for bankruptcy on Monday, it became the latest but surely not the last victim of the subprime mortgage collapse. Lehman owned more than $600 billion in assets. Financial institutions around the world have already reported more than half a trillion dollars of mortgage-related losses and that figure will most likely double or triple before the crisis exhausts itself.

But there is a bigger potential failure lurking: the American International Group, the insurance giant. It poses a much larger threat to the financial system than Lehman Brothers ever did because it plays an integral role in several key markets: credit derivatives, mortgages, corporate loans and hedge funds.

Read it all from the op-ed page of today's New York Times.

Filed under: * Economics, PoliticsEconomyStock Market

Posted September 16, 2008 at 5:27 pm

To comment on this article: Go to Article View

The URL for this article is http://www.kendallharmon.net/t19/index.php/t19/article/16206/

1. Br. Michael wrote:

You have cash and stuff.  Assets are stuff.  You can’t convert stuff into cash and you can’t pay liabilities without cash.  It’s that simple.

September 16, 7:00 pm | [comment link]
2. Tom Roberts wrote:

The myth of free markets ended with the takeover of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. Actually, it ended with their creation.

Remarkable quotation, which basically calls into question the whole motivation of the 20th century American experiment in capitalism.
So now that the NYT has declared that experiment as without principle, what is the underlying basis for US economics?

September 16, 7:15 pm | [comment link]
3. Byzantine wrote:

The underlying basis for US economics at this point is that a central committee with its own monetary printing press can allocate resources better than a free and unhindered market.  The Soviet experiment proved this hypothesis wrong.

September 17, 10:41 am | [comment link]

© 2014 Kendall S. Harmon. All rights reserved.

For original material from Titusonenine (such as articles and commentary by Dr. Harmon) permission to copy and distribute free of charge is granted, provided this notice, the logo, and the web site address are visible on all copies. For permission for use in for-profit publications, please email KSHarmon[at]mindspring[dot]com

<< Back to main page

<< Return to Mobile view (headlines)