Some critics of the [currently proposed immigration] legislation are already arguing that inviting millions of immigrants to stay permanently in the U.S. and become citizens will hasten the fading of a cohesive nation. They say that immigrants may become more interwoven into the fabric of the United States, but the ethnic patches to which they bind their identities will remain all too distinguishable from the rest of the American quilt.
How immigrants and their descendants see themselves will change over time, and they will simultaneously transform many aspects of what it means to be an American. This is undoubtedly an uncomfortable process, fraught with tension between newcomers and established Americans that can occasionally become explosive. But the real issue is whether the United States can provide opportunities for upward mobility so that immigrants can, in turn, fortify what is most essential to our nation's identity.
History is instructive on whether immigrants will create a messy patchwork of ethnicities in the U.S. About a century ago, a tide of Southern and Eastern European immigrants arriving on our shores raised fears similar to those we hear today. Then, as now, Americans worried that the newcomers were destroying American identity. Many were certain that Catholic immigrants would help the pope rule the United States from Rome, and that immigrant anarchists would destroy American democracy. Some eugenicists thought that the dark-skinned immigrants from Southern Europe would contaminate the American gene pool.
None of this came to pass, of course. The pope has no political say in American affairs, the United States is still a capitalist democracy, and there is nothing wrong with the American gene pool. The fact that these fears never materialized is often cited as proof that European-origin immigrants and their descendants successfully assimilated into an American societal monolith.
However, as sociologists Richard Alba and Victor Nee point out, much of the American identity as we know it today was shaped by previous waves of immigrants. For instance, they note that the Christian tradition of the Christmas tree and the leisure Sunday made their way into the American mainstream because German immigrants and their descendants brought these traditions with them. Where religion was concerned, Protestantism was the clear marker of the nonsecular mainstream. But because of the assimilation of millions of Jews and Catholics, we today commonly refer to an American "Judeo-Christian tradition," a far more encompassing notion of American religious identity than the one envisioned in the past.
Read it all.
Filed under: * Culture-Watch * Economics, Politics Immigration
Posted May 27, 2007 at 1:14 pm
To comment on this article: Go to Article View
The URL for this article is http://www.kendallharmon.net/t19/index.php/t19/article/3193/
|
2. Tom Roberts wrote:
I actually agree with most of the op-ed here, but the last paragraph is about as confused as the proposed immigration reform bills in Congress: OK to the education bit; our government schools (esp. in LA) are shaky. But the heathcare and better jobs prescriptions are quite irrelevant to this particular issue. The immigrants are here precisely because those two situations are drastically better here, in aggregate, than where they come from. May 27, 2:30 pm | [comment link] |
|
3. azusa wrote:
Why stop at 12 million? Why not 40 million? Mexico has 100+ millions. Why shouldn’t they come to New Spain? May 27, 3:07 pm | [comment link] |
|
4. Tom Roberts wrote:
#3 Well, we probably messed up in 1848 in not annexing the whole country. Adding all those relatively rich and free (Mexico had abolished slavery already and was per capita more affluent than the US at that time) Mexicans would have probably prevented the Civil War. |
|
5. Irenaeus wrote:
“Immigrants don’t destroy our national identity, they renew it” The immigrants I come into contact with (and there are many) are overwhelmingly honest, courteous, cheerful, and hard-working. I don’t defend illegality or minimize the burdens on particular localities. But at a big-picture level current immigration does not threaten American identity. May 27, 5:35 pm | [comment link] |
|
6. Philip Snyder wrote:
Irenaeus, Illegal immigration has many problems. They are a perpetual underclass that are constantly exploited by the criminal element because the illegals will not go to the police for fear of deportation. They are often paid under the table for low wages because they cannot complain to the authorities. From a social justice standpoint, they are a group in constant injustice because they place themselve outside the mechanisms that society has for justice. YBIC, “I do not believe because I understand. I believe in order that I might understand” - Anselm |
|
7. viamediator wrote:
I remember when I was a kid some new neighbors came to town and they told us horror stories about the war in Europe (they had been in the center of it). When we are not in the midst of a storm it is easy to say it can’t be that bad. |
|
8. azusa wrote:
# 4: as I’m sure you guessed, my question was semi-ironic. 19th century immigaration from Europe was largely open but restricted practicalities (the Atlantic). If the US is going to have borders, it should enforce them. May 28, 5:33 am | [comment link] |
|
9. Larry Morse wrote:
But unrestricted immigration does threaten our identity now, because our identity is already so fragmented. In earlier centuries, not onlywere the numbers smaller but the available space was vastly larger. It may be tht there are hisanics who are cheerful and hardworking. We have all met such. But you had better look at the urban Hispanic gangs, the penetration of the Columbian drug cartel with its numberless dealers, and measure accurately what has already been cited, the enormous burden the citizens bear in all the social services. And if you haven’t faced spainish-speakers in public schools, kids who don’t know or can’t be bothered to learn American, and if you haven’t faced their behavior when there is supposed to be teaching going on….well, you betterlook again. The public schools already have more thn its share of hoods; the Hispanics have added a new level and new numbers. And guess which taxpayers pick up the bill? |
|
10. Tom Roberts wrote:
#6+9 Both of your apt observations about the issues with the healthcare and education systems cannot be separated from the dysfunctionalities that already exist in these areas. If Spanish speakers are not forced to learn English, that is because our administrations don’t force native Americans to learn English. The poor illegals who get health care for ‘free’ are entitled to that service by the same municipal and state boards who entitle any person to show up at regional trauma centers for little or no charge. These are issues that might be exacerbated by immigration, and could be mitigated by proper border controls. But they are there in the first instance because we don’t do anything about their first causes. I only wish to warn of the danger here of confusing cause with effect. May 28, 9:46 am | [comment link] |
|
11. Larry Morse wrote:
Your warning of confusing cause and effect is just. It is worth mentioning however, that Hispanic illegals in particular, because they will take any job that will let them hide, are perpetuating the minimum wage curse that allows vast numbers of businesses to pay below-living-cost wages and get away with it. BUt one thing is clear, the Hispanics, legal and illegal, are eroding what is left of the American identity without putting anything of equal value in its place. You only have to visit southern Cal. L May 28, 5:25 pm | [comment link] |
|
12. Richard Hoover wrote:
I bet Jimemez is an open border man. At least, his lack of attention to enforcement of the laws suggests that there can never be enough illegal immigrants to suit him, that his priorities lie with the illegals, not with the interests of the United States. May 29, 3:55 am | [comment link] |
|
13. libraryjim wrote:
If Spanish speakers are not forced to learn English, that is because our administrations don’t force native Americans to learn English. Jim Elliott “The world is a dangerous place to live — not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don’t do anything about it.”—Albert Einstein May 29, 12:14 pm | [comment link] |
© 2012 Kendall S. Harmon. All rights reserved.
For original material from Titusonenine (such as articles and commentary by Dr. Harmon) permission to copy and distribute free of charge is granted, provided this notice, the logo, and the web site address are visible on all copies. For permission for use in for-profit publications, please email KSHarmon[at]mindspring[dot]com
<< Return to Mobile view (headlines)

It’s true: LEGAL immigrants do contribute much to our society.
It’s ILLEGAL aliens who work against it.
Jim Elliott
“The world is a dangerous place to live — not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don’t do anything about it.”—Albert Einstein
May 27, 2:23 pm | [comment link]