The Rev. Jim Lewis, Canon to the Ordinary for the diocese, told The Christian Post that the official report on the renunciation is inaccurate since Lawrence "never offered a renunciation of his orders."

"The TEC canons are explicit that such a renunciation must be in writing, to the presiding bishop, expressing the desire to be removed," said Lewis.

"None of those criteria have been met because it has never been the intention of Bishop Lawrence to renounce his orders. It is also not canonically possible to consider a request for renunciation while another disciplinary canon is in effect."

Read it all.

Filed under: * Anglican - Episcopal • Episcopal Church (TEC) • Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori • TEC Bishops • TEC Conflicts • TEC Conflicts: South Carolina • TEC Polity & Canons • * South Carolina • * Theology • Ethics / Moral Theology • Pastoral Theology

1. Ralph wrote: And the words that are used For to get the ship confused Will not be understood as they’re spoken. For the chains of the sea Will have busted in the night, And be buried at the bottom of the ocean It’s clear that the diocese has left TEC, and it seems clear that until +Mark resigns from the HOB, renounces his orders, or is canonically deposed, he is a TEC bishop. My understanding is that he has done none of that. Thus, TEC is in a constitutional crisis of the PB’s own making. And, as far as I can tell, there are no provisions for resolving the constitutional crisis, other than to pretend that there isn’t one. December 8, 5:08 pm | [comment link]

---

© 2013 Kendall S. Harmon. All rights reserved.

For original material from Titusonenine (such as articles and commentary by Dr. Harmon) permission to copy and distribute free of charge is granted, provided this notice, the logo, and the web site address are visible on all copies. For permission for use in for-profit publications, please email KSHarmon[at]mindspring[dot]com

<< Back to main page

<< Return to Mobile view (headlines)