(Varsity) Dawkins v Williams: the Union debate
As [Arif] Ahmed recited figures on Anglicanism’s decline Rowan Williams grew restless, causing Ahmed to ask the master of Magdalene pointedly: “Do you want a point of information?” The room broke out in laughter as Williams responded by motioning for Ahmed to ‘bring it on’.
The Spectator columnist Douglas Murray, arguing for the relevance of religion in the 21st century despite the “awkward position” of being an atheist, finished the debate by declaring that “no rational person could agree with this motion". Religion, alongside humanism and secularism, has “a contribution to make”, Murray argued, telling students that without religion you may end up “with something like a perpetual version of The Only Way is Essex”.
Priyanka Kulkarni, Pembroke first year, said: “Tonight's debate was highly anticipated, the queue spanning for what seemed to be miles was an indicator that this was going to be a highlight of the union this term.”
Read it all.
Filed under: * Anglican - Episcopal Archbishop of Canterbury --Rowan Williams * Culture-Watch Education Religion & Culture Young Adults * International News & Commentary England / UK * Religion News & Commentary Other Faiths Atheism * Theology Apologetics
1 Comments
Posted February 3, 2013 at 2:16 pm
Posted February 3, 2013 at 2:16 pm
To comment on this article: Go to Article View
The URL for this article is http://www.kendallharmon.net/t19/index.php/t19/article/47511/
© 2013 Kendall S. Harmon. All rights reserved.
For original material from Titusonenine (such as articles and commentary by Dr. Harmon) permission to copy and distribute free of charge is granted, provided this notice, the logo, and the web site address are visible on all copies. For permission for use in for-profit publications, please email KSHarmon[at]mindspring[dot]com
<< Return to Mobile view (headlines)

Sounds like a nice little coffee-hour with exchanges of various assertions of theory, supposition, and feeling—plus another attempt to burnish the rusted flaking tin of Rowan Williams’ reputation.
I wonder if anyone at all bothered with one of the first rules of debates which is to actually define the terms—like the word “religion.”
February 3, 9:56 pm | [comment link]